http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t_drive_review
Weird, how they mention the design chief saying how great the MkIV was and how the MkV sucked donkey balls...all I ever heard about the MkIV is how the MkIII was better or how the MkIV was a step backwards...
Then again, Car and Driver is not exactly the epitome of unbiased (or unbought) opinions. The only one worse is Motortrend (whose "best x of XXXX" is not actually based on what's best in the segment, only what's best among "brand new redesigned models for that year"....meaning if something was not redesigned but was class leader by a longshot, it would not win the award).
Then again, the MkV is plagued by (the omnipresent since the 1.8t days) DV failures now joined by crappy PCV system and even MOAR rattles and wind noise and timing pull even on stage 1 tunes...Oh and loose subframe bolts, and miscellaneous FAIL....
Weird, how they mention the design chief saying how great the MkIV was and how the MkV sucked donkey balls...all I ever heard about the MkIV is how the MkIII was better or how the MkIV was a step backwards...
Then again, Car and Driver is not exactly the epitome of unbiased (or unbought) opinions. The only one worse is Motortrend (whose "best x of XXXX" is not actually based on what's best in the segment, only what's best among "brand new redesigned models for that year"....meaning if something was not redesigned but was class leader by a longshot, it would not win the award).
Then again, the MkV is plagued by (the omnipresent since the 1.8t days) DV failures now joined by crappy PCV system and even MOAR rattles and wind noise and timing pull even on stage 1 tunes...Oh and loose subframe bolts, and miscellaneous FAIL....
Comment