If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don't think it could have been taken from a second vehicle as the car is too perfectly in focus relative to the blurred background. The camera had to have been attached to the car.
besides not being blurred, i'm not sure the reflection of that house works for alignment either. its the same house as in the background for sure, but with the way it shows up on the hood, i'd almost think you'd see that tree on the hood too, or the car was in front of the house instead of beside it. Could be deceiving though.
Logically, If A Second Car Was Moving At Approx The Same Speed The Car Beside It Would Looked Clear But As They're Both Moving The Background Would Be Blurred
1) 2007 Candy white MKV GTI. DSG, votex kit, 19" Privat netz, tinted tails, smoked side markers & mirror signals, 20% tint, TT stubby, APR sport 3" turbo back exhaust, ABD stage 2 cold air intake. GONE.
2) 1993 Green Corrado VR6. ABD intake. FK Silverline coils, Zimmerman cross drilled & slotted rotors. GONE.
A slower shutter speed can be effective by producing the "blur" effect of the subject or background, giving the feeling of speed or motion. To blur the background, pan with the moving subject and then snap while still moving.
Done similar to the blur shots Derick did of our cars a couple years back - long shutter speed, slow moving car (for less vibration), and camera mounted to the car.
In the pic I posted the photographer photoshopped the camera rig out of the photo afterwards.
Comment