Well, here's part one of my tip vs 5 speed driveline loss series. Part 2 will be after the 5 speed swap.
The runs were done at about 19 PSI on the stock SMIC (which by runs 4 and 7 was completely heat soaked). So with a proper FMIC and another 2-3 PSI I imagine that there is some more power to be had. However the results are what they are. What impressed me most was the area under the torque curve. Boost onset is really linear and the useful portion of the torque curve spans all the way from 3000-6500.
I'd also like to send a shout out to Lawrence and the guys at Calgary Autoworks for helping out on this one. If you haven't been over there yet, go check 'em out http://www.calgaryautoworks.com/ Great bunch of guys.
*No additional tuning or boost was added for the The M5 + 94 oct run. I pretty much just put it in and let 'er rip*
Run 4 on 94 oct was 225.7 WHP 225.2 ft/lb
Run 7 on M5 + 94 oct was 232.7 WHP 231.8 ft/lb
The runs were done at about 19 PSI on the stock SMIC (which by runs 4 and 7 was completely heat soaked). So with a proper FMIC and another 2-3 PSI I imagine that there is some more power to be had. However the results are what they are. What impressed me most was the area under the torque curve. Boost onset is really linear and the useful portion of the torque curve spans all the way from 3000-6500.
I'd also like to send a shout out to Lawrence and the guys at Calgary Autoworks for helping out on this one. If you haven't been over there yet, go check 'em out http://www.calgaryautoworks.com/ Great bunch of guys.
*No additional tuning or boost was added for the The M5 + 94 oct run. I pretty much just put it in and let 'er rip*
Run 4 on 94 oct was 225.7 WHP 225.2 ft/lb
Run 7 on M5 + 94 oct was 232.7 WHP 231.8 ft/lb
Comment