So I've been doing some research on the idea and wanted to know if anyone else here has attempted it. Better yet, I'm wondering if anyone has some hard data as to the difference it makes. From what I've gathered it makes a substantial difference in compressor efficiency. To the point where you're almost isothermal (dropping below ambient temps under compression).
However, I'm also aware that compressor erosion is a possibility. After looking around it seems like the major cause is A: Putting the nozzle in a location with bends and blocks which allow puddling and B: Large droplets forming as the nozzle pressure drops and ceases to properly atomize the W/M mix.
I spoke to the guys at Snow performance and they said the jury was still out. However, they have a solenoid setup that would eliminate the line pressure drop. Also, running a higher methanol to water ratio (75/25) helps insofar as the methanol vaporizes before it can impact with the compressor. I figure this, coupled with a 60 ml/min nozzle (the smallest one) right in front of the compressor may be viable.
Any thoughts from the peanut gallery?
However, I'm also aware that compressor erosion is a possibility. After looking around it seems like the major cause is A: Putting the nozzle in a location with bends and blocks which allow puddling and B: Large droplets forming as the nozzle pressure drops and ceases to properly atomize the W/M mix.
I spoke to the guys at Snow performance and they said the jury was still out. However, they have a solenoid setup that would eliminate the line pressure drop. Also, running a higher methanol to water ratio (75/25) helps insofar as the methanol vaporizes before it can impact with the compressor. I figure this, coupled with a 60 ml/min nozzle (the smallest one) right in front of the compressor may be viable.
Any thoughts from the peanut gallery?
Comment